Blog: Josh Lewis » The iPad and the Importance of Focus:
You hate Jane, don’t you. Just say it. Go ahead, give her that netbook and slap her in the face. You jerk.
Meet Jane.
Oooh this is nice!
The Kinetic Sculpture consists of 714 metal spheres, hanging from thin steel wires. Each sphere can be moved individually, and through some amazing software, moving shapes can be created.
The Kinetic Sculpture is created by ART+COM, a digital media design agency based in Berlin, Germany, for the BMW Museum in Munich, Germany.
ART+COM have animated a seven minute long mechatronic narrative – a dance in mid-air. (Thx, Floris!)
This beautiful minimalist bin, designed by Japanese designer Shigeichiro Takeuchi, consists of nothing more than a cylindrical body and a wooden lid – but no moving parts added.
The wooden lid tilts without a mechanism; it just balances on the diagonal cut of the cylinder. The shapes and angles doing all the work.
And although it consists of just two parts, the bin definitely has its own identity.
“At the end of the day, I know it’s a cliche, but people are our most important asset in the world by far. It’s people who deliver innovation.”
- Tim Cook
Simplicity is hard. Let’s go shopping! [dive into mark]:
My point, such that I have one, is that simplicity is easy to describe but difficult to achieve. Especially (though not exclusively) when there are other people in your life.
Gosh, this is so very true. A hilarious must read. (thx Jonas Wisser)
When I published my post titled, “Dear Mr. Jobs” last week, I heard a couple of comments about my “cluttered” menubar. It got me thinking about the current move towards minimalism and simplicity in regards to our digital tools. It’s a movement that I’m greatly in favour of. It has been wonderful… to see a work like Patrick’s Minimal Mac receive so much attention and success.
But at times, I wonder if it isn’t just the next fad. It’s certainly partly a backlash to the personal productivity movement, with GTD at the centre. But maybe it’s also the new GTD. Instead of doing work, people are still tinkering. But now they do so under the guise of ‘reducing’ or ‘simplifying’. But in the end, it’s the same issue. The boring tasks that you need to do are still on your list. But we have a whole new generation of singly focused, minimalistic tools that tempt us to switch from whatever we’re using now.
Please don’t take this the wrong way. I love what Patrick and others are doing: helping people focus on what is needed and avoiding what they don’t. But the whole genre is vulnerable to going down the same path that personal productivity did.
And so, back to the comments that were made about my menubar. Cluttered? Only if I didn’t use the items that reside therein. Which I do.
I prefer, when possible, to keep an item in my menubar rather than in the Dock. I prefer a tool in my menubar over a Dashboard widget. Why? Because it suits my preferences and fits my workflow.
I’m fairly sure I could lose 2 days of work looking for ways to configure those tools to be accessed in some other fashion. But why? Just so I can post screenshots that will cause others to say, “This guy is so zen. He’s must be in the zone all. the. time!”
Minimalism in computing is not about how your computer looks. It’s about how you use it — ensuring it has everything you need and nothing you don’t.
It should come as a surprise to no one who has really been following along here for the past several months that I agree with Chris 100%. I have said as much here, here, here, and even more I will not bother linking to (seriously, search around, I say this stuff all the time).
See, I am in this weird position. I feel like I kind of helped to start something that has nothing to do with what I believe in (which is what I have said I believe in and what Chris believes in, as he so elegantly stated above). Yet, the only way for me to combat it is to show up every day and continue to express what I believe in. Which, inevitably, some people myopically think is something other than what I believe in.
Believe me when I tell you this stuff weighs on me heavily. Like, really heavily. It is the reason why you see no posts for a day or two at times. I just not sure I want to contribute to all of these people who think the key to “minimalism” and “simplicity” is killing off their menubar and dock. I can’t tell you how many times my finger has hovered over the delete account button… Sigh.
Just so we are clear…
I believe the most minimal computer is the one that is optimized for you. How you work. The menubar items you need. The dock items you need. The applications you need. The system you need. The peripherals you need. The tools you need to get the job done.
I believe most of us do not take the time often enough to evaluate what that need is. The entire mission of this site is to help you ask those questions and find the answer that is right. The only answer that is right. The one that is right for you and only you.
Update: I have added this info to the about page.
Update #2: Chris and I have had this back and forth before. Resulting in pretty much the same response by me… Good times.
Prompted by our recent post on single-drawer Less Stuff, Belgian industrial designer Pieterjan Deblauwe sent in this prototype he made a fw years back.
If you’re a bit like me, your first response will probably something like ’Okay, a shelf, yeah, so?‘ In that case I suggest that you read the next line and then quickly click on through to the rest of the images.
What you are looking at here is Shellf: a bedside table to hide your little secrets. The designer says this:
Objects take volumes out of the space which surrounds you. Here the idea is to use the space which is taken by the object.
Pretty smart!
From the consumer’s perspective, I don’t see a compelling reason to keep the iPod around. If presented with the option of either an iPod Classic or Nano model or a touch OS device for the same price, I suspect 19 out of 20 people would select the Touch.
Gosh, I can’t help but feel Sean is right about this. It is something I have felt for a while but have been afraid to publicly vocalize. I do have to say that, though it goes against what I believe in, I’m very tempted to buy an iPod nano just to have one before I can’t anymore.
That said, I do think that a device in the nano and shuffle range fills a need for a certain segment of folks that the touch does not. That segment is workout enthusiasts and active folks who need something small and incredibly durable. That female snowboarder who was singing out of tune at the top of her lungs before her Olympic run was rocking a nano. I just can’t see a touch taking that kind of abuse (tonal or otherwise). On the other hand, as Sean points out, this is a niche segment that Apple has no financial reason to cater to.
Ephemera: The Mac tool for Instapaper & ebook reader enthusiasts:
Ephemera – If you are looking for a simple way to get your Instapaper cache into your eBook reader (It supports just about every device), this looks like a slick way to do so.
cityofsound: For the life between buildings - some notes on the iPad:
There’s been lots of talk of it being a ‘third’ product, in-between iPhone and laptop. To me, this reminds me of ‘third places’. That’s a Ray Oldenburg term, of The Great Good Place, and generally refers to cafés, bars, libraries etc. Thus the iPad to me feels more like a product for third places rather than a third product. Its form factor and service model is defined for in-between spaces. Although it will float around the home and the office perfectly well, it comes into its own in these third spaces in a way that that phone and laptop cannot, being either too small or too large respectively.
I have largely avoided posting much about the iPad here lately. Largely because most of the conversation has been lots of takes on the same issues (multitasking, Flash, the future of the UI, etc.). This piece is very different and refreshing. It provides some new perspectives I certainly have not seen elsewhere. Worth the long read. (thx Marco. Seriously, thanks.)
via The Simpler Life
I see how full that dock is, yet I still can’t help but love this.
Despite their humble, decades-old base technology (plain text), innovative uses of lo-fi technologies can be remarkably hi-fi, as in the case of AJAX (whose most famous application may be Google’s Gmail service).
Some things we believe in here for sure.
A project group of Hyper Island – Robbin Ingvarsson, Fredrik Holmberg, Kristina Herngren, Anke Buchta, Simon Schlüter and Waldemar Wegelin- rebranded the Swedish Armed Forces. They turned the usual function of camouflage around and used one of the basic shapes of geometry, the triangle, to create a new type of camouflage that is all about showing yourself. The goal is to reflect the diversity with the Armed Forces.
The focus for Swedish Army is peacekeeping abroad. In order to fullfill their missions they want to attract new talent – brain rather than muscles.
The challenge of the rebrand was to change the Swedish Armed Forces from a traditional defensive institute into a modern employeer.
We all have desires – it’s part of the human condition.
We want to be loved, to have friends, to experience joy, to have security.
But a desire for things is not as natural as we’re often led to believe. Sure, we all have desires for things: nice cars, nice clothes, nice houses, cool computers and iPhones, beautiful furniture and notebooks and shoes and jewelry and bags and bikes and on and on.
But these desires are manufactured in us, by advertising and marketing. They play on our natural instincts: for hoarding (security), for the pleasures of food and drugs and sex (desire for joy), for fitting in with clothes and bikes and gadgets (desire for friends), and so on.
Desires like these lead to all kinds of problems — in fact, all the problems of modern society. They are rooted in the immense power of corporations in our society, and their drive for massive profits. Problems result that include obesity and related diseases, massive consumer debt, shallow consumerism, overwork (to make money for all these things), lack of true human connection, and more.
And while desires are perfectly natural and unavoidable, if we can learn to let go of the manufactured desires, we’ll start to free ourselves from the chains of consumerism.
Start to become aware of these desires – recognize their signs in you. Pause before acting on them. Take deep breaths, go for a walk, get some perspective. You don’t really need more things, and buying is not the answer. Make do without and find happiness without more stuff.
Let the desire go, and feel the lightness, the freedom. Become liberated from desires, one at a time (not forever, but for the moment). You’ll love it.
Why use three dimensions if you can do the same with two? This table lamp arrives in a flat envelope, leaving you to bend the steel up into its dynamic two-dimensional form, thread the cord and screw in the bulb.
This interactive piece designed by the Luis Eslava Studio has the silhouette of a lamp die-cut on a stainless steel sheet. The cable is used to hold the structure and to tense the volume; and, on the other hand, the strong red or black color used depending on the model makes it acquire an important decorative role. It plays a very important part in the design of this piece.