“It matters who’s at the top. It sets the company tone. Microsoft is undoubtedly full of very smart people, but as long as they are being run by Steve Ballmer, they’re going to be shackled by his ineptitude.” You couldn’t pay me to work for Ballmer - DHH of 37signals See also: As Edward Tufte might say, beautiful evidence.
-

Steve Jobs: The Next Insanely Great Thing:
Design is not limited to fancy new gadgets. Our family just bought a new washing machine and dryer. We didn’t have a very good one so we spent a little time looking at them. It turns out that the Americans make washers and dryers all wrong. The Europeans make them much better - but they take twice as long to do clothes! It turns out that they wash them with about a quarter as much water and your clothes end up with a lot less detergent on them. Most important, they don’t trash your clothes. They use a lot less soap, a lot less water, but they come out much cleaner, much softer, and they last a lot longer.
We spent some time in our family talking about what’s the trade-off we want to make. We ended up talking a lot about design, but also about the values of our family. Did we care most about getting our wash done in an hour versus an hour and a half? Or did we care most about our clothes feeling really soft and lasting longer? Did we care about using a quarter of the water? We spent about two weeks talking about this every night at the dinner table. We’d get around to that old washer-dryer discussion. And the talk was about design.
We ended up opting for these Miele appliances, made in Germany. They’re too expensive, but that’s just because nobody buys them in this country. They are really wonderfully made and one of the few products we’ve bought over the last few years that we’re all really happy about. These guys really thought the process through. They did such a great job designing these washers and dryers. I got more thrill out of them than I have out of any piece of high tech in years.
I was recently reminded of this 1996 interview with Steve Jobs in Wired Magazine by my friend Scott Jackson. It’s a great interview and an interesting look back from a historical perspective but it was this answer, to the very last question, “Is there anything well designed today that inspires you?”, that struck me. Though I have read this interview and quotes from it many times since first published, this time it got me thinking about some things in a way I had not fleshed out before.
First, why are we all not, as individuals, as families, as a society, putting the same amount of thought and consideration into everything we purchase? What if, before every major purchase, we examined what our real needs were and we had discussions about it around the dinner table with the people we love who would be affected by the decision? What are the advantages, the tradeoffs, the things we care about, and the things we don’t? In the context I set forth here on this site, I am arguing that you should put at least this much thought into a purchase that in many cases will be over a thousand dollars and something you will likely have to live with for two to three years. Why not apply this method to everything else?
Second, can you imagine what the world would be like, or would look like, if we all did this? It would be an entirely different place. Companies that thrive on mediocrity, commoditization, and appealing to the lowest common denominator simply would not be able to thrive and likely not exist. If we all raised our expectations and deepened our considerations then corporations would have to compete on the basis of quality and design and not price (or at least far less so).
Third, if we should all put this much care into what we consume, I would argue (hope) that we should put this much care, if not more, into what we produce.
I’m certainly not a model citizen here but I can tell you that I care a great deal. Sharp eyed readers may have noticed that I make slight edits and wording changes to most of the things I post. Sometimes I do this within minutes of posting them. I also have been known to re-read a post that is weeks old and make slight and subtle changes even though no one will notice but me. Why? Two reasons:
I once had a teacher in a creative writing class convince me that, when it comes to art, nothing is ever finished or absolved from the potential to change or improve. If I see something that I made that I think could be improved I do so, no matter the time or audience.
Some of us have entered the world of Art because we expect it to be liberaring and meaningful. We admire art in galleries and museums and have chosen a couple of art pieces we want to live with every day.
Copenhagen Penthouse by Norm Architects is a white space where you can create large art-hanging displays, highlighted by museum-quality lighting. All the lights are dimmable: an ideal setting for an art collection. Danish Architects Kasper Rønn and Jonas Bjerre-Poulsen call it “The intelligent house.” iPhone users, this is for you. The penthouse owners, can control the lights, the fireplace and the air conditioning with a single touch on their iPhone. Authentically cool.
Is technology here to inspire us through art forms? I am always intrigued by our preference for noise. The show goes on.
Inspired by the structure of leafs New York City based industrial designer Alvaro Uribe created the Plum Stool. An eye-catching organic and natural furniture piece.
Plum is part of a study into the concepts of lightness, structure and material. Made of carbon fiber, with a weight of only 300 grams, and due to its bended structure almost indestructible.
“I get to hang out with some of the most talented, committed people around and together we get to play in this sandbox and build these cool products.” (For the record: If anyone should, you know, find an iSandbox in a bar, do the right thing and turn it in to the bartender.)
-
The Walled Garden - Neven Mrgan’s tumbl:
Aren’t the benefits of a closed, carefully managed garden clearly visible? The experience is controlled, so it tells a story - one which may not emerge from a democratic, anything-goes process (or do you think this sort of slow and deliberate story would emerge in a busy American city in the year 2010?) Charging for admission means that the place can be maintained, improved, and marketed. There are downsides to this, of course — maybe the management makes boneheaded decisions now and then. Maybe you think that vine maple would look better a little to the left — maybe you’re even right
More required reading.
No, it’s not a new iMac… This is Area, a table lamp designed by Milano based Habits Studio for Italian lighting manufacturer Luceplan.
The Area is packed with interesting features. It is a LED lamp, which is energy efficient, but which also allows for a beautiful flat design. The large white plexiglass surface disperses the light in a uniform way, but it is also backlit – yep: light from the front and the back.
And there’s more: with a series of aluminium supports you can easily turn the table lamp into a pendant, wall lamp, and even floor lamp.
Oh, and you switch it on and off via a touch sensor in the side of the frame. Sweet… (Thx, Jorge!)
AJ Jacobs: My colossal task burden | Life and style | The Guardian :
I’m going to recapture my attention span. I pledge to go cold turkey from multitasking for a month. Only single tasks. Uni-tasking. And, just as important, I’ll stick with each task for more than my average 30 seconds. I’ll be the most focused man in the world.
AJ Jacobs sets out to spend 30 days reforming is multitasking ways. Required reading. (via Kottke)
Why an iPad and a Mac mini are my computing future:
Three years ago when I bought the iMac, I dismissed the mini as too weak and actually looked at a Mac Pro. At one point, I thought about going to a “one Mac” solution and getting a 17” MacBook Pro, but the arrival of the iPad has made me totally reevaluate my computing needs and realize that — at least for me — a desktop powerful enough for my needs (which today’s Mac mini is) plus an iPad is a better trade off than a powerful portable computer.
TJ Luoma of TUAW has put some thought into what is “enough” for him. You should too.
Jon Gordon is the current Social Media and Mobile Editor for Minnesota Public Radio News. You can follow his work on the MPR NewsQ Facebook page or on Twitter.
I became a fan of his work as the former host of American Public Media’s Future Tense, a radio show about technology and how it shapes our lives. I am now proud to call Jon a friend and have watched with interest his move from someone originally skeptical of the iPad to someone who is a fan. I thought a brief interview about this change would be something fun and informative to share here.
I got the impression you were skeptical about the iPad at first and if it would be something that is truly useful. You recently mentioned that not only do you use it but you love it, limitations and all. What changed?
I’m skeptical about every new gadget that comes along. For the iPad, I was worried that it would be a kludgy first generation device and that it would be sort of a portal to a world of unwelcome, new spending — you know, magazine subscriptions, movies, apps. I also had a hard time imagining where it would fit in my computing life between smart phones, laptops, and desktops. But here’s the deal: the next generation will be lots better but this iPad feels fairly refined; I have spent some money to feed the iPad with content but most of what I do is free; and the iPad found a place amongst all those other devices — it’s become the check-the-Internet-while-watching-TV device and respond-to-emails-while-still-in-bed device and the squeeee-I-don’t-have-to-worry-much-about-battery-life device. Is the iPad a necessity? No, but it’s nice. Not perfect (implementation of Safari stinks, Google apps kid of icky, lack of multitasking, ease with which you can do the wrong thing when you touch the screen) but hey, we’re all flawed.
What are the things you mainly use it for?
I’m not using it for lots of new things, really. It’s just easier to do some of my email, Internet surfing and other stuff on the iPad. Strangely I also use it to take a break from my work desktop. I set it beside my Windows 7 box and use it as sort of a you’ve-got-mail! thingy — when I hear it chime, I get to leave the keyboard, slide back in my chair, and use a touch interface to do a little email. Seems odd but I appreciate spreading my computing time to different devices. I would never write a message as long as this one on the iPad (I have no external keyboard for it) but for quick replies it’s great.
Has it replaced any other device you would otherwise use or significantly reduced your usage of a laptop or desktop?
Laptop, definitely. Using that a lot less.
What are your favorite/most used apps on the iPad? Any third party apps that you recommend?
Let’s see. iBooks, Instapaper, Kayak Flights, NewsRack, Urbanspoon, and yes, Solitaire. It’s the only game in town.
Question for my own personal data, do you mainly use it in portrait or landscape orientation?
Depends on the app I guess. But when I first pick it up to mess around, it’s usually portrait.
There’s a criticism of voluntary simplicity or minimalism (two flavors of the same thing) that seems to be widely accepted: that it’s a luxury of relatively affluent people, that it’s not something the poor can afford to do.
I disagree: anyone can do it.
Minimalism is simply eliminating the unnecessary. And while the poor (anyone who’s not in the middle class or above) might not have the ridiculously unnecessary things that the affluent have, there are usually things that can be eliminated.
The photos of minimalist houses, desks, and Macs that you see on many minimalist sites are obviously for the affluent — they have expensive furniture, computers, gadgets, homes that aren’t affordable for many people. But that’s not a requirement of minimalism.
In fact, there isn’t a requirement for minimalism. You can invent your own version, and if you’re more worried about how to survive until the next paycheck (I’ve been there), then cutting back on the unnecessary will help you get there. Look for unnecessary expenses (like eating out, going to the movies, buying junk food snacks, or renting DVDs) and eliminate them, finding ways to have fun that are free.
Eliminating unnecessary possessions also means you’ll need a smaller home, which will save on rent and heating/cooling. Buying fewer things means less debt. Spending time with loved ones or doing things you love means you spend less. All of these things are good whether you’re wealthy or not.
It’s true that the poor are often thought of as not having the luxury of even thinking about simplifying, or minimalism. They’re too worried about putting food on the table, or where the rent is coming from, or how to avoid creditors until the next paycheck. And there’s a lot of truth in that. But it doesn’t have to be true: anyone can pause, breathe, and decide to live differently.
Anyone can make the decision to do without the unnecessary, to cut off cable TV, to consider doing without a car, to only buy what’s absolutely necessary and to rethink what’s necessary. I’ve been deep in debt, and I know the feeling of drowning with no way to get out. I got out, mostly because I cut expenses to the bone while looking for ways to increase income. Minimalism helped me to get out of debt, and to get out of poverty. It’s not just for the affluent anymore.
I love pasta meals and, as being a visual designer, icon like illustrations and infographics. I fell in love with the The Geometry of Pasta book.
The Geometry of Pasta, with recipes of Top Michelin starred chef Jacob Kennedy, shows you “how to develop an instinct for matching pasta and sauce. We explain how to team up pasta with sauce to maximise taste and texture and to turn you from an average into a great pasta cook.”
This cookbook is not like the average cookbook. You won’t find any photos of a steaming plates of fine pasta. Instead you find nice illustrations by Caz Hildebrand, creative partner at Here Design, of pasta shapes, arranged in bold and simple patterns printed in black and white.
The interaction of light and shadow is fascinating. Shadows captured by the lens of Vangelis Paterakis evoke dreams of shadow and light with elongated shapes and softness of lightning. It’s a rare technique.
With his Shadow Light creation, Greek photographer, Vangelis Paterakis captures human bodies in motion under the light. He builds contrast between the background and subject. The figures become expressive and recognizable when the real and the abstract appear side by side. He is almost trying to withdraw the attention from the subject to only project their soul. A cool detached and conceptual aspect of humans.
Does a photo need to tell it all? Minimalism seems to have resolved this.
The Web Shatters Focus, Rewires Brains:
Author Nicholas Carr in an article in Wired.
On the Net, we face many information faucets, all going full blast. Our little thimble overflows as we rush from tap to tap. We transfer only a small jumble of drops from different faucets, not a continuous, coherent stream.
A fascinating — and frightening — reinforcement of what we are all coming to know. The article focuses on web pages littered with links, images, and video, but I would assume that computers with a multitude of applications has a similar affect on our work.
And so we ask the Internet to keep interrupting us in ever more varied ways. We willingly accept the loss of concentration and focus, the fragmentation of our attention, and the thinning of our thoughts in return for the wealth of compelling, or at least diverting, information we receive. We rarely stop to think that it might actually make more sense just to tune it all out.
Man, that really hits home.
Wow. What more can I add? Go read the full article. Certainly cause to pause for reflection. Also, I want to mention that Mr. Bowler is one of my personal heroes when it comes to his ability to firewall his time and attention. Therefore, if this hit home with him just think about the nightmares it will give the rest of us.
This is the first of several part of an interview by Diego of the wonderful Italian website, Il Mac Minimalista. Conducted originally in English, it will be translated into a far more beautiful language for the readers on his site (here’s the Italian version). I wanted to make sure to share it with you as well. It is, by far, one of the best email exchanges I have had in a very long time. I plan to share the reasons why in a future post at my personal site because there are lessons to be learned from it, the main one being is the idea that just because we can communicate at light speed does not mean we always should. The best part… It’s not over yet. Look for Part 2 sometime in the future.
When did the idea of creating Minimal Mac come up and why? I mean, is there a real need of reducing, using less, in this era of abundance?
It actually came with very little forethought and practically full formed. I describe what happened in great detail here: The 24 Hour Idea
I think it was driven by a desire to join the ideals of buddhism and minimalism that I have long subscribed to and my ideal approach towards technology – specifically Apple products, since that is what I use. I think this idea immediately resonated with others who, in this time of seemingly limitless technology, massive storage, and ubiquitous connectivity, were feeling as overwhelmed by it all as I was.
I wanted to create a place where I could curate both my original ideas on the subject, and include others images, software, hardware, and examples, all exploring the theme of “enough” and what that means today in the area of technology.
Many “geeks” (including myself) have serious problems handling the enormous number of incoming notifications, where by notifications I mean stuff like facebook notifications, incoming emails & calls, updated feeds, and so on. What’s your advice to them?
I think the first piece of advice is for people to realize that they make the choice on how many “inboxes” to have to a large extent. I think if you make your intentions on how to deal with these well known, up front, people then know what to expect.
I’m old enough to remember a time before email, before voicemail, before answering machines. When someone called you on a telephone, and you were not available, the responsibility was on the caller to try again, not you, the receiver. There was no way to know if you missed a call.
Technology has changed this behavior and the expectation. The responsibility is now placed on the receiver and not the sender. Therefore, it is up to us to make known how we plan to meet that expectation.
For example, in my last job, I let all of my coworkers know that I only looked at and responded to email twice a day for 1 hour. Once in the morning at 9am and then again at 4pm. Also, I set the email to manual checking so that, what I retrieved at those times was all I was going to see for an hour. If someone sent me an email at 4:15pm, I would not see it until 9am the next morning. It took a short time but, eventually, my coworkers learned that if it was something that required my immediate attention, the last thing they should do is send me an email. They called for urgent matters and questions instead and I had less email to deal with.
If you let people know what the expectations are and offer alternatives, everyone will be happier. I let people know how much I hate Facebook, rarely use it and only keep it for friends that use it to send invites to important events. Therefore, it is not an “inbox” one should contact me through for anything other than that.
This said, I do think it is rather sad that we live in a world where we have to “train” others about how we wish to interact. There was a more simple time.
For example, do you have tons of feeds that only a part of them is daily read or you just keep the numbers low? Do you think solutions like Fever (the feedreader) are worth? I mean, the idea that it gives is that we aren’t able to handle the “incomings” and we have to be helped by a software. Is that the sad truth?
I have a writeup on how I manage as many feeds as I do here: My RSS System
That said, I think it is important here to realize that we are better editors of our own capabilities than any software could ever be. We simply need to assume that responsibility. I consider keeping my eye on a wealth of incoming information part of my role and responsibility as a Curator. The very idea of the term is someone who looks at a lot and knows which things are important and representative of the theme and, perhaps more importantly, which to say “no” to. I am able to have a ton of RSS subscriptions because I know which ones are truly valuable and which ones I can safely ignore.
I think we owe it to ourselves to do this with most everything in our lives. Find your limits. Find your loves. Respect each deeply.